Steve Ellis

More on virtual events: the need to evolve current models

Yesterday I posted on feedback from Judith Hurwitz and James Governor on their experiences of attending virtual events. Extending some of those thoughts, Judith's summary, which James also endorsed, was:

1. Virtual conferences need really good planning and execution. It cannot simply be a disconnected voice with some slides on a shared screen. That is called a conference call.

2. Streaming or live video is wonderful but it needs to have the technology foundation so that it will work no matter what the customer/participant’s environment happens to be.

3. If virtual conferences are to work they have to be conferences.  I don’t think that we have good models for executing virtual conferences that work. They need to be electric, informative, and have interactivity.  Right now the virtual meeting is not a true model. It is simply old execution applied to a new idea.

I'd agree with most of the above. With the possible exception of the last couple of sentences.

Taking the points in order:

Yes, just like face-to-face conferences, virtual events need great planning and preparation. We have a specialist virtual events team and, just like our live events team, they often have to tell clients that unless the content is interesting and presentation is top quality, it doesn't matter if the event is virtual or not, it will flop.

Yes, the technology needs to just work. This actually becomes more critical the smaller the size of audience. With thousands of visitors online no-one notices if ten people drop off, but with just thirty visitors, losing ten would distract all the participants and send the event down a cul de sac.

Regarding the last couple of sentences:

Right now the virtual meeting is not a true model. It is simply old execution applied to a new idea.

Yes, that is probably an accurate view of the typical virtual event today. But I would say that the organizations that are running and hosting frequent virtual events - the Microsoft's and Cisco's - are rapidly gathering the practical knowhow, the technology platforms and the conceptual frameworks or execution models, that will achieve success.

Tags: , , ,

Published 24 Jun 2009 by Steve

Comments

 

Cece Salomon-Lee said:

Hi Steve, You raise some very good points about virtual conferences. With regard to Cisco, they have done a good job chronicling their use of virtual conferences, such as this post on the different between physical and virtual (http://blogs.cisco.com/virtualworlds/comments/valueofvirtual/).

One thing to keep in mind, like Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, we're just at the beginning of Virtual Events 1.0. The industry is maturing with new technology providers (disclosure: I work for one of them), and more companies turning to virtual out of economic necessity. By the end of this year, I believe that we will start seeing the industry going from "Should I do a virtual conference?" to "Why and when I should do one" as part of a larger marketing strategy.

Best,
Cece
June 25, 2009 16:27
 

Steve said:

Hi Cece

Thanks for the pointer. I'll take a look at the Cisco info.

I agree with you. The debate has moved along. Just last night I discussed with a client not if they should participate, but how they would get best value from participating in a virtual event.

Steve
June 25, 2009 17:03

What do you think?

(required) 
(optional)
(required)